How many witnesses Jose Bar diyaeul testimony in Afghanistan?

politicsballa.blogspot.com ® How many witnesses Jose Bar diyaeul testimony in Afghanistan?

Subject caused by longhaired freaky person: How many witnesses testified seeing Jose Padilla in Afghanistan?

You know, where was a “terrorist” and all?

He admitted?? Any other facts you’d like to make up?

It’s not hard, Daniel L. If the government wants to claim he was in Afghanistan, they just have to show some evidence. They did not. The fact that they were able to convince 12 dummies in right-wing Miami doesn’t prove anything. This will be overturned on appeal.


However this is tips concerning How many witnesses testified seeing Jose Padilla in Afghanistan? you may will want to clear up complications his or her self. Confidently this helps in several ways, and build your own life significantly better. Who wish tips concerning How many witnesses testified seeing Jose Padilla in Afghanistan? just might be an answer inside the foreseeable future.

Best solution:


Answer by Pony Soprano

Are you related to him or something. You seem a tad obsessed.


Answer by Smilin’ Jack

“Guilty on all charges” is the only part that matters. Stop whining.


Answer by danielle

I hope he rots. Send him a card if you feel so bad.


Answer by Z H

ah….

well they gotta hang someone for all the terrorism right. I dont think it set well that Saddam got it. He wasnt a terrorist. Just one of our installed dictators. Sort of like shooting your own man by my accounts. They arent looking for the Osama guy. Whats a government to do?


Answer by elmerfud

He was not convicted of being in Afghanistan, he was convicted of conspiracy, which he admitted to….Get a life and grow up. These people want to kill you and you don’t have a clue……##########3


Answer by Littletwin

he wants you dead wake up


Answer by Daniel L

Go coddle him in prison if he’s such a nice guy. Seriously, the man attended Al Qaeda training camps. Yes that little piece paper with his fingerprints on it was enough to convict him. Sorry you guys lost another liberal posterboy who would be a face for bashing the Bush administration. But he was training to be a terrorist and was planning on killing people. Why you feel sorry for him is beyond me.


Edit: Keep dreaming on that one. Right wing Miami? Have you ever been there? That is one of the most liberal areas of Florida. That’s the area retirees from up North move to and has a huge population of liberal Cubans. You seriously have no clue sometimes do you?


double edit: From the BBC, he flew in from Pakistan and and AL Qaeda member told the FBI about Padilla. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2037444.stm

anything else I can help you with?


Answer by Bumblebee711

Hey, F*ck Jose Padilla, that punk.


Answer by Super Shiraz

he was convicted. you give the impression of sympathy for Al Qaida


Answer by dez604

Why am I not surprised that you are defending a traitor to his country, I have told you before if you want to be with the terrorists then go join them 2, stop hating your country and if you don’t like it here than move and see if you enjoy the same freedoms you take for granted everyday on here.


Answer by j

Good point, Jose Padilla was held for 3 1/2 years without charges ever being brought up against him, and was even denied an attorney. He finally was allowed to have one right before the case went to the Supreme Court. This completely violated his fifth and sixth amendment rights right there. The government then accuses him plotting to denoate a “dirty bomb”, but instead he gets charges brought up on him for supporting terrorists. Him being held without charges against him should have thrown up a huge red flag. Him being denied a lawyer should of done the same. And should of sent a message that maybe the government doesn’t have anything on him. By the way, at the time the government said it was “allowing Padilla access to counsel as a matter of discretion and military authority. Such access is not required by domestic or international law and should not be treated as a precedent.” This was a carefully determined tactic. By granting Padilla access to a lawyer, the government was trying to prevent the Supreme Court from ruling on whether they had to provide Padilla with a lawyer. Now his case has made it back to the Supreme Court. Again, the Supreme Court is about to decide whether to hear his case. And, again, the government has decided that, at its discretion, it will grant Jose Padilla his constitutionally guaranteed rights. The government will now try to convince the Supreme Court and that Padilla’s claims are irrelevant because he’s been charged with a crime. By doing so, the government will retain its self-appointed power to lock you up without a lawyer or criminal charges until the Supreme Court rules on your case, which we’ve seen can take years. So, a small degree of celebration is in order. But the problem has always been more about what power the president claims to have than about this one case. Now Padilla being charged isn’t a sign that the Bush administration tyrants have had a change of heart, but simply a tactic of that tyranny. To sum it up: Padilla will get a trial so that you won’t when they come for you. Why are we allowing our government to do this, and why are we allowing the government to take our Constitutional rights away from us?


Do know a lot better?

Add your own answer within a comments!


Half A Terrorist


Concept with Half A Terrorist


The word terrorist itself or anyone remotely associated as one, has gained the connotation as great evil that must be eradicated at any cost. Appearing on the side of a pedestrian walkway, this angry looking torn poster gains an evil like aura after the World Trade Center attacks and the reverberating reaction to Sept. 11, 2001. Terrorist ! Muenster, Germany


How many witnesses Jose Bar diyaeul testimony in Afghanistan?

Blog Archive